Safety of mRNA vaccines during the initial 6 months of the US COVID-19 vaccination programme
an observational study of reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System and v-safe (March 7, 2022 released online)
I just found The Lancet CDC-funded study (see link at bottom) referred to by USA Today and others this week and guess what?
(Why didn’t they breakdown the ages 18-49 cohort into smaller bite sizes like the other age cohorts? Because they are hiding deaths in young adults….)
The vaccine death rate (VDR) baked into the mRNA Pfizer and Moderna gene editing technology injection cake is 1.3%. (as a reference if you were to vaccinate 300 million Americans the number that would die from this injection based on a VDR of 1.3% would be 3.9 million people.)
THAT IS HIGHER THAN THE DEATH RATE BLAMED ON THE SO-CALLED VIRUS ITSELF OF 1.19% that is without all the myocarditis, pericarditis, thrombocytopenia, strokes, Guillain-Barre, infertility impacts and so on.
All the deaths officially attributed to the virus were based either on nonspecific to SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests that had a very high (almost all) false positive cycle threshold (Ct) rate when used at the suggested WHO/CDC max cycle threshold range of 35-40 Ct, or in confirmed lab cultures conducted on the Vero (monkey) cell line, not in a healthy human cell line.
Up to 15 WEEKS of damage and death from the injections is considered to have occurred in the UNVACCINATED by the CDC’s new definition of fully vaccinated: two weeks after the J&J, five weeks after the first Pfizer dose and six weeks after the first Moderna dose. It jumps up to 15 weeks (three months plus two weeks) for the two dose mRNA injections after the CDC updated their website to say if you get the first mRNA dose and then get Covid you should WAIT UP TO THREE MONTHS to get the second dose, which means up to 105 days or 15 weeks (since “fully vaccinated” is two weeks after the second dose) worth of adverse effects and deaths considered to be in the unvaccinated.
(Chart updated for period ending 8/19/2022 -https://vaersanalysis.info/2022/08/26/vaers-summary-for-covid-19-vaccines-through-8-19-2022/)
Naturally they were NEVER able to isolate, purify or replicate any virus in any healthy human cell line and only small fragments in cancerous (CALU-3, COCA-2 and A549) human cell lines. Equally revealing is they could only reproduce fractions of it in interferon-deficient African green monkey Vero kidney cell lines AFTER dousing those cell lines with hepatic (kidney) destroying antibiotics and other chemicals as well as starving the cell line of nutrients in a non-sustaining medium. (As a side note the African green monkey Vero kidney cell line is the easiest of any cell line to infect and why it is the darling of research lab use...but results from animal lab cultures using that interferon-lacking cell line in no way represent any similarity to how effective a healthy human body and its cells might interact or respond to any toxins in its midst.)
Scientists may be using the wrong cells to study Covid-19
https://www.wired.com/story/scientists-may-be-using-the-wrong-cells-to-study-covid-19/
All “complete genome sequencing” they did on any so-called SARS-CoV-2 virus was done in silico (on a computer) with just 37 base pairs to begin with - the computer did 99.99% of the sequencing and creation of +/-30,000 base pairs using random fragment arranging to piece together a magical unicorn pathogenic virus.
10 good reasons why it is a SCAM
https://www.scribd.com/document/553296776/SARS-CoV-2-SCAM
Natural or Lab Made Spike Protein?
When China finally uploaded the chimeric genomic sequences to the Internet for the vaccine manufacturers and research labs to access, they were NOT sequences for the entire virus but rather just the spike protein. It is odd when nobody on the entire planet has a specimen of the whole virus with which to create potential vaccines, and they are offered only the spike protein portion uploaded by communist China. That is a lot of trust to have injected into your body.
A unique and highly unlikely natural problem is many of the uploaded spike protein sequences have shared proteomes (protein peptide sequences) with both humans and mice in particular and to lesser varying degrees with other mammals as well as other known human coronaviruses and it is highly unlikely that there would be one 6 or 7 amino acid long peptide sequence shared between a virus and a human let alone multiple ones; in fact it is a near mathematical impossibility.
The study looked at 1268 hexapeptides (six amino acid residues long) and 1267 heptapeptides (seven amino acid residues long). Out of the former there are 350 shared hexapeptides with the mathematical probability of JUST ONE shared hexapeptide between the coronavirus spike protein and any human peptide sequence being ~ 20−6 (or 1 out of 64,000,000 and there are 350 shared peptide sequences?) and out of the latter there are 28 shared heptapeptides with the mathematical probability of JUST ONE shared hexapeptide sequence between the coronavirus spike protein and any human peptide sequence being ~ 20−7 (or 1 out of 1,280,000,000 and there are 28 shared peptide sequences?).
And this coincidental shared sequences aberration grossly overshadows the peptide sequences that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein might share with its own relatives: the human coronaviruses used as the control group.
It is an absolute impossibility that the chimeric spike protein uploaded by China has MORE peptides in common with humans and mice than its own relative human coronaviruses.
Without question every lab downloaded those sequences and went to work to create their new technology injections and not a single one of them or any university or any other labs asked China for the whole complete virus to compare against the spike protein sequences uploaded or even to potentially create their own vaccine using novel non-spike protein sequences.
And not a single lab conducted ANY proteomic peptide cross reference studies to make sure there were none shared between the chimeric spike protein and human beings, despite it being common knowledge in the vaccine industry for decades that such shared sequences do in fact occur and are a concern.
Vaccine-induced autoimmunity: the role of molecular mimicry and immune crossreaction
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC6078966/#__ffn_sectitle
Gain of Function Research
A horseshoe bat coronavirus spike protein was modified in the lab at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) using a humanized mouse-adapted SARS-COV backbone in 2015 in a program funded by NIAID Ecohealth Alliance to the WIV...and they didn’t upload its sequence to GenBank until AFTER the SARS-CoV-2 virus had been sequenced 4.5 years later, in 2020? (Had they updated GenBank with the sequence before the outbreak there more than likely would have been a genomic exact match scenario and they would have been busted for creating the spike protein.) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC4797993/#!po=78.0702
This is of course gain of function research that Fauci has denied the NIH ever funded, but OOPS, “This article has been corrected” dated April 6, 2016 says: “In the version of this article initially published online, the authors omitted to acknowledge a funding source, USAID-EPT-PREDICT funding from EcoHealth Alliance, to Z.-L.S.” (Z.-L.S. is Zhengli-Li Shi, Wuhan Institute of Virology). And remember that many of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein peptides defy mathematical probability and match those found in...human and mouse proteomes (!) - and of course that would be because the chimeric spike protein was crafted in a Chinese lab with human peptides incorporated on a mouse-adapted SARS-COV backbone.
No SARS-CoV-2 Specimens Exist
Even the primers the CDC used for their Covid-19 RT-PCR test didn’t come from a SARS-CoV-2 virus...they came from “characterized stocks...of known titer” as no actual viral samples were available at the time they created the test. SARS-CoV-2 is fictional and does not exist in the real physical world as a pathogen and it only exists in a computer, in silico. (Not a single specimen sample can be had anywhere globally.)
Questionable Testing Protocol
Equally bad to all those truths is the tests aren’t even accurate, mostly returning false positives being run at the CDC/WHO recommended cycle thresholds of 35-40 AND the RT-PCR technology was not even designed to be a diagnostic “test” in the first place, it is merely technology designed to replicate what material is present - in this case increase the viral load to a level deemed threatening (but without the technology it would not be replicated to the high level!)
Your coronavirus test is positive, Maybe it shouldn’t be
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
And as of December 31, 2021 the technology lost its EUA Emergency Use Authorization status. (Still very odd it was used to detect something they had no samples of…to create the test itself, a complete joke.)
Why would it need EUA status anymore anyway? They built the new global one world on it, using its faulty results as the impetus for using and sharing the World Economic Forum’s legislative draft documents toward eliminating national sovereignty and merging the separate nation states into a one world government situation, closing down economies and destroying millions of small businesses globally. Most heinously as well used as a reason to psychologically destroy an entire generation of children who are now prepped to be unquestioning and quiet servants in a trans human system where they will “Own nothing and be happy,” by 2030.
The purpose of the technology was to run a global pandemic SCAM after the unexpected death of the inventor of the technology in August 2019, who had stopped Fauci from pulling this off back in the HIV-AIDS scare days. We were given a couple extra decades of freedom thanks to Dr. Mullis. 🙏
HIV-AIDS
Unsurprisingly they immediately started removing all caustic articles and reviews of the fraudulent HIV-AIDS correlation within MONTHS of Dr. Mullis’s passing. This article stood from 2014 until two months AFTER Mullis’s death in 2019?
And incredibly AIDS cases start increasing again...just as we are hearing that the Covid injections could cause a spike in HIV infections. https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2020/10/20/researchers-warn-some-covid-19-vaccines-could-increase-risk-of-hiv-infection/?sh=c87ef7e3740e
https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/02/1111372
...and all the HIV vaccine work once again reignited no longer having an inconvenient roadblock (Dr. Mullis) is around to stop it.
And they have adjusted the duration of mRNA safety studies to match those of the pandemic: ONLY SIX MONTHS. No more years of allowing adverse events to shake out like all previous vaccine technologies...AND FRIGHTENINGLY, THE “PLACEBO” FOR THE HIV-AIDS VACCINE is the mRNA vaccine and all animal studies flush out 100% death from such “vaccines.” Unbelievable.
IAVI is unsurprisingly funded by the Gates Foundation.
I ask you to please reread the beginning of this article to see the death rate of mRNA injections to ascertain the relevance of the HIV mRNA vaccine studies using mRNA injections as the placebo and those injections cause vaccine-induced Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (vAIDS)!! Those useless studies will make the HIV-AIDS vaccine look no worse than the placebo…of course.
It is a captured audience type situation, especially if they make Covid injections mandatory, then the HIV vaccine would also be mandatory because the former would cause the AIDS that the HIV vaccine purportedly would protect against. 🤯
And ironic too that new HIV variants are now zooming around the planet just as mRNA injections are tied to increased diagnoses of same.
https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/02/1111372
They used Dr. Mullis’s PCR multiplicity test like a cheap whore over and over again to justify stealing our freedoms and imposing draconian overlord status. THEY LIED.
VAERS Underreporting
So back to the study, they admit that there is UNDERREPORTING of adverse events in the VAERS database, while also making a point that the high VAERS adverse events numbers reported (for Covid injections) were probably due to robust injection recipient education and enumerated EUA requirements amongst healthcare providers to record (yet very few doctors are aware of this mandate let alone record adverse events symptoms post injection) all such events to the VAERS database, so as to explain why the Covid injection adverse event numbers are so much higher by comparison to all previous injections combined.
So they were trapped into acknowledging that the VAERS data is inaccurately underreported.
To adjust it based on an absolute minimum multiple of 20 (based on this October 2021 study for a study period of Feb-Aug 2021) NOT using loosey goosey underreported VAERS data - https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Spiro-Pantazatos/publication/355581860_COVID_vaccination_and_age-stratified_all-cause_mortality_risk/links/6212dae26c472329dcfa0152/COVID-vaccination-and-age-stratified-all-cause-mortality-risk.pdf?origin=publication_detail - then the actual death rate is estimated to be between 133,000 conservatively and 187,000 liberal in a mere six-month period of time from the mRNA injections. The anaphylaxis adverse event is estimated to be underreported by a multiple of 41.
These numbers will skyrocket when taking the entire year into account as so many tens of millions of high school and college age students deferred getting the vaccine until right before the school year started in August, the same month the study period concluded.
All cause mortality in the age range of 18-64 increased 40% in 2021 based on insurance company actuarials in the group life insurance category and those are historically extremely accurate.
We are in a serious crisis if we are not able to break away from these inversions of truth and deceptions and reclaim our health and our ability to think critically and stand confident and tall when saying, “No thank you.”
I will go in depth in my next post about the cause of the symptoms as well as what is behind the molecular mimicry/cross reactivity between human peptides and the spike protein peptides.
Stay safe and as wise as serpents, as gentle as Doves. 🙏🤍🕊🌱
Lancet Infect Dis 2022, Published Online: March 7, 2022 (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00123-2/fulltext)